How Do People Feel about the UK Coalition Government Assignment

How Do People Feel about the UK Coalition Government - Assignment Example People have seen an irony that is implicit in problems faced by the euro stems due to economic and political commentators that pointed out the various forms of integration. Moreover, this was associated with the failure of integration of the financial and fiscal policy that could have facilitated the national economic development and harmonization. Nonetheless, the coalition government has been faced with disenchantment in Germany, though this does not pose a challenge to the significance of European ideas. However, there was a chance that the action would cause the results of immense economic damages to the member states. The pro-Europeans have experienced difficult moments, and this is critical due to the challenges faced by the coalition, which surpassed the immediate difficulties in long term Britain. Therefore, this led to an increased need to collaborate with other European partners in a way that played an effective role in global politics. People have a feeling that the longer the coalition prevails, the more they are developing a negative attitude towards it as a form of government. During the general election, voters had a notion that they embraced ideas of the parties working together through a coalition (Luff, 2010, p. 1). There was a spare of polling aimed at marking the anniversary whereby numerous people had a conviction that the government was weak. Moreover, they had a conviction that the coalition government would be more indecisive and irresponsive to the citizens. For instance, there were people who claimed that the coalition government appeared to be confused. In addition, people claimed that there were chances of numerous bickering in the public, which would increase disenchantment through a continental style of government. However, there were no reasons for voters to be confused in a situation where the parties had taken the responsibility of reforms for restraining health services. The coalition government seems to facilitate an outbreak of tribalism, which posed a threat of undermining its key strategy. On the other hand, the government seems desperate, which is manifested by their spending cuts. Moreover, this was a reason for reactions made by the public due to the reform of services. There were other internal concerns resonating on the populist issues; in fact, the private firms were invading into the public sector. Moreover, people were also concerned with market-led reforms, which facilitated the transformation of services offered by the state. Other citizens have a conviction that the coalition government lacks a strong policy agenda and it has been focusing on eliminating progressive reforms. Therefore, a demonstration of the position was to object the things and fail to deal with implication caused by the deficiency. In this case, some of these actions depicted the weaknesses of the coalition government during the first two years in power.